Erin Brockovich is a legal clerk and environmental advocate who was essential in the groundwater contamination case of Hinkley, CA versus the Pacific Gas & Electric company. As an employee of Edward L. Masry’s legal firm, she investigated the cause of illnesses from residents in the town, where the PG & E factory resided for decades. Her findings included that the groundwater in Hinkley, CA had been contaminated with hexavalent chromium, now a noted carcinogen, used by PG & E to prevent rust in the machinery.
“At issue was a carcinogenic chemical called hexavalent chromium, known more simply as “chrome 6.” The company had detected the chemical in a monitoring well north of its compressor station in Hinkley, California. Groundwater in the area flowed north - toward the homes, and businesses, of PG&E’s neighbors (who used groundwater for drinking purposes). And those neighbors, at least some of them, were getting sick.”
The case was settled in 1996 for a record $333 million, a record amount for the largest settlement paid in a direct-action lawsuit in US legal history. Ten years later, PG & E agreed to pay an additional $295 million to settle with 1,100 more people for hexavalent chromium related claims However, many of the plaintiffs believed that their settlement money were not enough.
“Now, many of the townspeople who sued complain their awards were smaller than they deserved. Some have even hired lawyers to get back excessive legal fees charged to children. They say the attorneys kept their awards for six months after the settlement money was delivered, and that they didn’t receive interest on it. They complain that there was little or no apparent logic behind the varying amounts of money individual plaintiffs received; some claim that the arbitrators never even looked at their medical records.”
In my opinion, I feel that the families of those affected by the contamination received enough in settlement. Though I don’t know the exact amount each plaintiff received, it’s understandable for those involved to feel they deserve more money, especially with such a large amount to be reimbursed into so many plaintiffs. It’s difficult to gauge how much financial help the settlement assisted the residents of Hinkley, CA but I’m sure such an amount won against a large company’s wrongdoings is nothing but positive.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
EOC Week 2: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court
returns for its new term. Several cases are on the docket. One case that stood
out for me is one that looks over affirmative action at the University level.
Schuette v. Coalition
to Defend Affirmative Action
This case discusses
whether a state can amend its constitution to prohibit a public university from
using race or sex to make admissions decisions. This case looks to overturn the
previous decision made from the Barbara Grutter v Lee Bollinger decision of
2003, when the University of Michigan was allowed to use race as a factor in
assessing applicants. In 2006, Michigan residents responded by passing a
constitutional amendment banning the practice. Schuette v. Coalition to Defend
Affirmative Action is looking to examine whether this state amendment voted on
by its residents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th
Amendment. The last time the court talked about this issue was in Fisher v.
University of Texas at Austin, where the Supreme Court decided that race
relations to create adversity doesn’t violate.
“The court’s ruling in this case will affect
Michigan and five other states – California, Arizona, Nebraska, Oklahoma and
Washington – that have similar bans. Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself from the case, presumably
because of her work on the case in 2009 as U.S. Solicitor General. If the court
deadlocks 4-4, the 6th Circuit Appeals Court ruling
overturning the Michigan ban would become the governing law.” - George
E. Curry
In my opinion I agree
that universities should be able to diversify their student body. But I’ve
never been a fan of Affirmative Action as they promote the idea that a minority
(whether racial or gender) isn’t able to achieve something without being chosen
to improve a universities outlook. The root of the problem isn’t that
universities are horribly disproportionate in diversity, the problem is that
America’s public system doesn’t provide inner cities that are predominantly
minority an equal opportunity to succeed academically. But that’s for another
argument.
Thursday, October 10, 2013
EOC Week 1: Voice
The government name is Miguel. Call me MOOSE. I am a curator of sound
and a creator of music. As a student I obsess over presentation and how a
quality final product is supposed to sound. As a record producer, I am
obsessed with the creation process of
sounds. From sequencing drum patterns, to crafting melodies and groovy
rhythms, I aim to advance the way songs and albums are put together. As
a songwriter, I use it as an avenue to tell the stories of the life I
lived in and the world that I lived in. As
an audio mixer, I’m meticulously working with levels and EQs to create
the richest sound possible. I was predetermined to love it from birth.
My earliest memories have to be the countless hours I spent as a child
listening to classic MoTown, soul and funk
ballads driving with ma dukes to her work. Much like extended exposure
to radiation, music has changed my whole being. From the first rap I
wrote n 4th grade, I dreamed of doing nothing else but to be considered
as great as those musicians I looked up to.
Today I am steadfast in achieving that dream. If it has taught me
anything, it’s to stay true to myself. For as long as I live, sound will
always be the truest thing I know.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)